Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 01:16
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Which bands became massively popular for covering songs rather than recording originals?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
When was the first time you felt discriminated against because you were female?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What are the easy romantic novels to read to read for beginners?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
U.S. stock futures dip ahead of renewed trade talks with China - MarketWatch
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Scientists Stunned by Evidence of Ancient Birds Nested in the Arctic - The Daily Galaxy
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Your chatbot friend might be messing with your mind - The Washington Post